Last night’s Clubmark 2023 Review discussion was very lively. You can join round two, 9.30am on Thursday 16 February, by booking here.
Whether or not you intend joining us, there’s a quick LinkedIn strawpoll in the group asking about your preferred outcome from the Review. It’s necessarily in very simple terms asking you to vote for one of four options – the current standings are in the image – explained briefly in the post. It should take all of 30 seconds effort on your part and will help set the context for the discussions so please cast your vote.
You can also amplify your views on Clubmark and the reasons behind your Strawpoll vote in the LinkedIn discussion here*.
Following the discussion on a possible tie-up between Play Cricket and club administration software products, news that professional cricketers may seek ownership of personal performance data* revives past issues with Play Cricket and GDPR. It’s unlikely they’re resolved leaving clubs’ Play Cricket administrators in an increasingly uncomfortable position as the platform’s functionality expands.
And in the continuing nuisance neighbours* discussion, news in the comments also of ECB support for clubs needing to assess the risks from flying cricket balls. It seems if you’re affiliated to your county board, you can access a discounted offer on Labosport’s ball tracking technology.
*If you are logged-on to LinkedIn on your device right now you will have no problem accessing the asterisked links above. If not, you should click LinkedIn group page, log-in from there and scroll through the content. As well as the posts above you will find other current discussions:
Ed Smith on making better decisions
Appointment process for your captains?
Have you completed the Members’ Survey?
Cost of living crisis and club viability
Sport England small grants scheme reopens
Club funding opportunity from B3
Amazon Smile fundraising……..for, er, charitable clubs
Local community outreach
Do you know your RCRs from your GCRs?
And once you have done that, bookmark the page on your browser so you can return instantly in future. Or download the LinkedIn App on your phone.
The website Members’ Portal was launched in March and now nearly 300 members have already registered.
What you’ll find:
Repository: of club development documents, articles and links;
the most frequently downloaded tools in one place;
and club exemplars of club development plans, constitutions, codes of conduct, risk assessments and more
Discussions: all current and past sorted by theme and in chronological order with links to the LinkedIn discussion
Surveys: all results of past surveys on topical aspects of club leadership and development
Reviews: user ratings and comments on the ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of all the most commonly used club administration software and apps
Upcoming events: details including the current “breakfast club” dates
Past webinars: all recordings and background notes and documents
‘Club’ Excellence Framework ‘microsite’; background information and an invite to join the pilot
All you need to do:
Take a few minutes to complete the members’ survey and tell us a bit more about you, your club, and your club development priorities to help us plan next steps and how we can better support your endeavours. Please ensure you choose the correct survey by clicking on the appropriate button
3. Then simply register for access to the Portal here
You will get acknowledgement but your registration still needs to be approved. It says within 24-48 hours but, so long as you have already completed the appropriate survey(and no-one gets access without), it may well be quicker than that.
Then you are free to just browse away and discover the treasure-trove of resources to aid your club development journey. Go from the regularly updated Members’ Portal landing page each time or use the website’s drop down menu and go direct to your required pages. And don’t forget the latest news on the Home page.
As a ‘thank you’ for registering, you will see we have a 12-month subscription deal with our media partner, The Cricketer, which means copies for less than £3 a month delivered to your door. The deal can be shared with your clubmates, too!
The Portal will be a live continuously updated resource. So if you are able to share your club exemplars or recommend other documents and links to online sources of information, feel free to send or signpost them.
And, just to reiterate, members’ access to the Portal is FREE (forever)!
The Network Forum – The habits of highly effective clubs; the 7Fs Framework – with Chris Gunn took place on 28 March.
Chris is a successful fundraiser for Fulwood & Broughton Cricket Club. But as an academic at the University of Central Lancashire he has also completed doctoral research into the critical success factors in thriving cricket clubs. He has identified the 7Fs: Finance; Fundraising; Facing outwards; Facilities; Future focus; Families and friendship; Facilitative, flexible and functional.
This is the recording of the event:
The slides including the table of 7F factors can be found here
As Facilitator of the Network, I have written a few Club Scene articles for The Cricketer magazine over the past year. I have now been asked to write an article about you.
Well, it’s actually about the typical club leader. You may be typical. You may not. Let’s see.
In short, I am looking to delve into the common characteristics of club leaders. What qualifies them? What perspectives they have. What are their ambitions? What do they consider success to look like? And what would help them better deliver that?
I am also keen to understand how much time you commit – in winter as well as summer – and doing what? And why?
It’s an opportunity to dispel a few of the fallacies – not least that club leaders go away in September return in April – and spell out the contribution you make.
I would be really grateful if you could spare just a few minutes completing this survey – the first few have been submitted in well under 10 minutes – and the information required will be in your head.
All the results will be aggregated and anonymised unless you give me explicit permission to include you in the article. Yes, I am looking for a few interview candidates, too, over the next couple of weeks.
I confess I was reticent when asked by the guys at The Cricketer online to help promote their LV Insurance Pride of Cricket awards scheme.
You will know we have a media partnership and there’s a magazine/digital subscription discount offer for Network members registering on the FREE Members’ Portal
But nominations have been open since May and we are now in the last week before the September 1 deadline.
I am told it’s not an issue as a majority of nominations are received in this period. And, anyway, the submission process is not that onerous. The video entry option isn’t widely used and has no influence on judging so long as the story is well articulated.
I am also reticent because a) endorsing the awards might also endorse the implicit assumption that club people need to be engaged during the season before they hibernate in the winter and b) as our current strawpoll clearly indicates, people are too busy running from pillar to post during the (business end of) the season to go on holiday let alone compile awards submissions.
They get that. If so, it clearly demonstrate more listening capacity than ECB with their insistence on scheduling Clubmark renewal, Volunteer (OSCA) Awards, Playing Survey and just about everything else deadlines between April and September. Those involved in running clubs – the volunteers – know that peak admin catch-up and development planning is between October and March.
But the real reason I was reticent, was a longstanding feeling that people don’t volunteer for awards or recognition or any other aspects of a “volunteering policy”. They volunteer for cricket or their club.
Quite often recipients are embarrassed by such awards. I know I was a few years ago.
But a conversation a while ago has made me think again. It was someone a deal older, and wiser perhaps, than me who received a well-deserved and overdue county lifetime contribution gong in their mid-80s after 60+ years supporting their club.
He said no-one volunteers for themselves. It’s always for cricket or the club and that’s determined by how they started but it’s almost always by joining a club. And unlike many other awards – military medals or real Oscars, for example – it’s rarely recognition of a team or collective contribution.
So it’s very personal. Hence the embarrassment.
But, he said, if the nomination comes from the club then it almost certainly indicates your contribution is making a difference. And people appreciate that. They care. And, yes, maybe they might want to encourage you carry on. It helps salve their own embarrassment for not doing more. But perhaps, moreover, the award might just galvanise others to support you or contribute more in other ways.
So if you have want to recognise, retain, conscience salve, or galvanise, then The Pride of Cricket Awards are as good a way as any.
You can access the Awards portal by clicking on the image above.
The ECB and its chief executive should know they’re in trouble when that hitherto bastion of the cricket establishment, Wisden Almanack, includes this excoriating attackin the 2022 edition published today.
In detailing the litany of woes from Ashes to Rafiq and beyond, this paragraph quoting editor Lawrence Booth is the final thrust:
“The ethics of the bonus scandal were as bad as the optics. But there was an exit strategy, if only Harrison would recognise it: the bonus should either be returned, allowing the ECB to re-employ some of the staff whose work still had to be done, or used to broaden the game’s diversity. If, by now, he has resigned or refused the money, we applaud. If not, there is still time to undo at least part of the damage.”
From a club perspective it is the most telling. The majority of those redundancies were amongst the most club-facing people in the ECB. Now you may say that we haven’t noticed the difference. That clubs have developed in recent years despite, not because of, ECB support activities. That more money is seemingly being thrown around more generously to more clubs now than ever before.
And all of those things have a degree of truth in them. But that’s not the fault of those ECB people working or, more likely, had worked with clubs. They operated within parameters set for them, and then made redundant, by people who have shown they couldn’t give two hoots about the recreational game……… until it matters to them. By that I mean Lawrence Booth’s targets and those brought in to run Participation & Growth as an adjunct of The Hundred marketing and public affairs strategy.
Make hay while the money is being scattered around because it will not last. I used the phrase ‘helicopter money’ as that is a legitimate but largely discredited tool to boost ailing economies by getting money quickly to people who will spend it. It was last used by Haile Selassie, personally handing out wads of devalued bank notes from the back of his vintage open-top Rolls Royce in downtown Addis, in the 1970s. That didn’t end well either.
The county boards had their funding guaranteed for three years from last year. And that includes the c£150k a year each county has been given for the County Grants Fund. But, after that, things are much less certain. The clue is in the creeping ‘privatisation’ of the county board structures with many converting to charitable foundations or setting up charitable fundraising arms.
The ‘Partnerships’ thing is about finding money from different sources. So if your club gets funding from the local authority or local community or charitable funders, expect to be competing with your county board or ‘foundation’ in future. And the county golf days, music events, and other fundraising – which you may think cut across your own activities – to become more frequent. Or increasingly centralised county and ‘franchised’ area junior coaching activities under the guise of ‘Pathways’ or Chance to Shine drawing kids away from your own programmes.
But not giving two hoots doesn’t prevent the current ECB governance grab that is happening in our domain. If you are not familiar with the ECB’s General Conduct Regulations then you need to be. I know this has been a hobbyhorse in recent weeks but you really do need to take notice because even if you’re not an ECB Premier League club, it may well be coming to you this year and certainly by 2023. Pressure is already being mounted in briefing calls to county boards and non-Premier leagues to ‘voluntarily’ impose on clubs in 2022.
It is not just about on and off-field behaviour. It is not just on the back of the Rafiq affair and the reputational risks for the ECB inherent in a largely unregulated clubs network. Although they have gone into meltdown over a widely reported incident involving two Leicestershire clubs and a league official recently. It’s about how far can ECB impose its authority over the club game. The answer right now, and they know it, is not very far. Unless you are taking their money.
Remember the Covid ‘guidance’ to clubs while ECB negotiated with government on conditions? They were rattled by the sounds of mutiny coming from clubs growing impatient with progress in getting back on the field. They realised their position to deliver on any agreement with government – and pursuit of any subsequent bailout that might ultimately be required to keep the professional game afloat – could be undermined by ostensibly independent clubs and leagues doing their own thing.
So there you have it. The anonymous “sources close to……..” in the clubs article in the upcoming May edition of The Cricketer is me. Not that should be a surprise as I have had two articles published in my name in recent months, as Facilitator of the Network, inferring much the same.
That The Cricketer leads the charge on ECB shortcomings, under its newly refreshed editorial and commentary team, should have been more of a shock than that of Wisden, given its heritage as the most establishment of cricket organs. But would founder Plum Warner be turning in his grave? He may feel that the cricket establishment had already been deposed, in its control of the game, by reward-driven marketing men.
And I feel no need to apologise. Judging by the responses to the members’ survey as people sign up to our Members’ Portal, you overwhelmingly wish we would take a harder stance as ‘critical friend’ to ECB or even to represent the club game more vigorously. But the Network was never set up to take on these roles. It was set up as a community of practice so club officers could share knowledge and learning for mutual benefit and collective advancement. Independently, by me, as I felt someone should and, as was patently obvious through numerous discussions, the ECB just wasn’t interested.
As I have always been at pains to point out to the many in ECB and county boards I have engaged with over the years, we are not 1,000+ seething malcontents hiding behind our website firewall or closely scrutinised access to the LinkedIn group. Far from it, in fact, as we have worked productively for the benefit of clubs on projects with ECB including with some of the people made redundant. We have held past webinars with others including then head of Participation & Growth, Matt Dwyer. Some of them are now involved in the Network because they have gone back to working in their original club roles or feature in our recent events because they are now working with other relevant agencies or have valuable insights to offer.
But enough is enough. It pains me to say this as someone who has previously both valued and defended the ECB and tried to promote some of the many good things done by people who genuinely cared. But the ECB is no longer fit for purpose if its purpose includes development of the club game. On this I stand full square with Wisden Almanack and The Cricketer.
They say it’s the hope that kills you. So, so much for Melbourne. But it can only get better, right? So here’s to a happy New Year!
Only one topic, today, as it’s an urgent one.
Over recent years, the question of which, if any, club admin software has been a recurring theme in our discussions. So, by now, most of us should have been using one or more proprietary products and for long enough to have formed a view as to their efficacy?
Seemingly, but under sufferance in many cases, judging by the responses received to our Review survey, so far. None exactly fits the bill which is surprising given the amount of time and energy, not to mention money, thrown into development of new products.
But we do not, yet, have a fully representative picture.
So, over the next few days, can you please spend the average 3-4 minutes it is taking others to complete a review for the product (or products) your club is using here.
The survey will be kept open indefinitely, with periodic promotion, to enable uptodate rolling ratings to be published. And the comments on pros & cons are equally, if not more, valuable.
But we need critical mass to start with, so please contribute if you can.
*To access the LinkedIn links, you need to be a member and logged into LinkedIn.
Anyone involved in running a recreational cricket club (maybe Clubmarked but not exclusively so) can join, contribute to and benefit from discussions with club peers, on everything and anything related to club leadership, management and development.
Allocated responsibilities for delivering the plan to those with the right competence/skill sets
Can anyone genuinely respond 1,2 3 and 4 and claim that commitment to the vision is largely unquestioned, all who need to buy in to the strategy have bought in, the plan is guiding everything the club focuses time on, and you and your committee are leading – that is inspiring, engaging, guiding, supporting, coaching, mentoring and occasionally directing – and not just managing yourselves or the few involved in delivering?
If yes, then what’s your secret?
I have had some very interesting conversations on the back of the ECBCA Zoom calls over the summer. Primarily around the role of leadership in clubs………………..